Reactions from the Other Germany: The Fischer Controversy in the German Democratic Republic.

This article seeks to understand East German reactions to the Fischer controversy within the broader context of German-German historiographical relations during the Cold War. For an interpretive framework it draws on Christoph Kleßmann’s notion of the history of the two Germanys after 1945 as being the record of an asymmetrical process of ‘intertwining and differentiation’ (Verflechtung und Abgrenzung). With varying degrees of scepticism and enthusiasm, East German scholars of the First World War sought to maintain links with, and at the same time to distance themselves ideologically from, the ‘Fischer school’ in Hamburg. Beyond this, Fischer’s particular mode of challenging the dominance of the historist tradition in West Germany enjoyed a very positive reception in the GDR and had a genuine and significant impact on the methodological approach and style of argumentation adopted by at least two of the main East German experts on the 1914–18 period. In a final section, the article examines what these findings can tell us more generally about the interlinked nature of East and West German historiography, in spite of the divisions of the Cold War. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of Journal of Contemporary History is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)